Reaping the Benefits of Technology Is Central to Controlling Costs and Providing Better Services |
One of the six major categories in our high risk series is
obtaining an adequate return on multibillion dollar investments in
information technology.1 We added this category in 1995 because we
continued to find major system development projects that greatly exceed
estimated costs, fall years behind schedule, and fail to achieve
operational goals. These failures have left the Congress and executive
branch severely handicapped by the lack of
reliable data. Moveover, huge opportunities have been lost to use
technology to reduce federal operating costs and improve program
performance.
The effective use of information technology is integral in
some way to solving problems in all the high-risk areas mentioned in our
1997 series. The seriousness of these information management
problems is underscored by the fact that nearly every aspect of over
$1.5 trillion in annual federal government operations depends on
information systems. Additionally, the American public, enjoying
the everyday benefits of technology-driven service improvements in the
private sector, are becoming increasingly frustrated with poor
performance from federal agencies.
In our 1997 high risk report on information management and
technology, 2 we focus on four major modernization efforts that provide a vivid
study in technology management problems that, unfortunately, are all too
typical across the federal government.
• The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) has
spent or obligated over $3 billion since 1986 on its Tax Systems
Modernization (TSM), which is designed to overhaul the
paper-intensive approach to tax return processing. We reported in 1995
that the modernization lacked basic elements needed to bring it to a
successful conclusion, such as a comprehensive business strategy for
reducing paper filings and the requisite management, software
development, and technical infrastructure. We made over a dozen
recommendations to address these weaknesses, including implementing (1)
a sound process to manage technology investments, (2) disciplined
procedures for software requirements management, and (3) an integrated
systems architecture.
We reported in
June and September 1996 that IRS
had initiated many activities to
improve its modernization efforts but had not fully implemented any of
our recommendations. The Congress subsequently directed IRS to
establish a schedule for implementing GAO’s
recommendations. It also required regular status reports on corrective
actions and TSM spending. IRS and the
Department of the Treasury have taken steps to address our
recommendations and respond to congressional direction, but further
concerted, sustained improvement efforts are needed.3
• For over 15
years, the Federal Aviation Administration’s (FAA)
$34-billion air traffic control (ATC)
modernization has experienced cost overruns, schedule delays, and
performance shortfalls. Though FAA
has recently made important progress
on aspects of the modernization, some serious problems remain.
Most notably, this large effort has long proceeded without the
benefit of a complete systems architecture to guide the modernization’s
development and evolution. Among other things, this lack of a technical
blueprint has led to unnecessarily higher spending to buy, integrate,
and maintain hardware and software. We have recommended that
FAA develop and enforce a complete systems
architecture. Exacerbating the modernization’s problems is
unreliable information on costs—both future estimates of costs and
accumulations of actual costs. We have recommended that
FAA institutionalize a defined cost process and
develop and implement a managerial cost accounting
capability.4 • The
Department of Defense’s (DOD)
Corporate Information Management (CIM) effort
was supposed to save billions of dollars by streamlining operations and
implementing standard information systems in areas such as materiel
management, personnel, finance, and transportation. But after 8 years
and $20 billion in spending on CIM,
DOD has yet to meet its savings goals, largely
because of its failure to implement sound management practices for
CIM. We have recommended that DOD (1)
better link system modernization projects to business process
improvement efforts, (2) establish plans
and performance measures and clearly defined roles and responsibilities
for implementing CIM, (3) improve controls over information
technology investments, and (4) not initiate system improvement projects
without sound economic and technical analyses.5 DOD has yet
to successfully implement these recommendations and continues to spend
billions of dollars on system migration projects with little sound
analytical justification. Recently, however, DOD has begun
an initiative to better manage its technology investments using its
planning, programming, and budgeting system. • Similarly, the National Weather Service
(NWS) has yet to resolve serious problems with its
$4.5-billion modernization effort. New radars are not always up and
running when severe weather is threatening and ground-based sensors fall
short of performance and user expectations. We have recommended several
actions for correcting these problems and have also recommended that
NWS improve its technical capabilities to design and
manage the modernization. NWS
has addressed some of our concerns
in these areas, but others remain. We also recommended that NWS establish
a sound decision-making process for managing the modernization’s massive
investment and getting promised returns from technology. Finally, the
modernization effort has long gone without a systems architecture to
guide it. In response to our recommendations, NWS has begun
to develop a technical blueprint for the modernization. However, until a
systems architecture is developed and enforced, the modernization will
continue to incur higher system development and maintenance
costs.6
Correcting problems in these four major modernization
efforts is important. But we also recognize the need to address and
overcome the root causes of the government’s chronic information
management problems. To do this, GAO has
worked closely with the Congress and the administration to fundamentally
revamp and modernize federal information management practices. We studied
information management practices at leading public-sector and
private-sector organizations—ones that have dramatically improved their
performance and met mission goals through the use of technology. In our
executive guide to improving information management, we identified
proven techniques used by these successful organizations and developed
an integrated set of information management practices for federal
agencies.7
The 104th Congress used these best practices to craft the
first major information management reform legislation in over a decade:
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 ( PRA) and the
Clinger-Cohen Act of 1996. These laws emphasize involving senior
executives in information management decisions, establishing
senior-level Chief Information Officers, tightening controls over
technology spending, redesigning inefficient work processes, and using
performance measures to assess technology’s contribution to achieving
mission results. These management practices provide agencies—such as
IRS for tax systems—a practical means of addressing
their information problems, maximizing benefits from technology
spending, and controlling the risks of system development efforts.
Past experience has shown that the early days following
the passage of reform legislation are telling. Let me quickly highlight
areas where this Committee can ensure that these reforms get off to a
strong start.
1 Over the last 6 years, federal agencies have
obligated about $145 billion to activities related to information
technology. This figure does not include many additional billions of
dollars that go to software embedded in Defense weapons
systems.
2
Information
Management and Technology (GAO/HR-97-9).
3 Tax Systems Modernization: Management and
Technical Weaknesses Must Be Corrected If Modernization Is to
Succeed (GAO/AIMD-95-156, July 26, 1995); Tax Systems
Modernization: Actions Underway But IRS Has Not Yet Corrected Management
and Technical Weaknesses (GAO/AIMD-96-106, June 7, 1996); and Tax
Systems Modernization: Actions Underway But Management and Technical
Weaknesses Not Yet Corrected (GAO/T-AIMD-96-165, September 10,
1996).
4
Advanced
Automation System: Implications of Problems and Recent Changes
(GAO/T-RCED-94-188, April 13, 1994); Air Traffic Control: Good
Progress on Interim Replacement for Outage-Plagued System, but Risks Can
Be Further Reduced (GAO/AIMD-97-2, October 17, 1996); Air Traffic
Control: Complete and Enforced Architecture Needed for FAA Systems
Modernization (GAO/AIMD-97-30, February 3, 1997); and Air Traffic
Control: Improved Cost Information Needed to Make Billion Dollar
Modernization Investment Decisions (GAO/AIMD-97-20, January 22,
1997).
5
Defense
Management: Stronger Support Needed for Corporate Information Management
Initiative to Succeed (GAO/AIMD/NSIAD-94-101, April 12, 1994);
Defense Management: Selection of Depot Maintenance Standard System
Not Based on Sufficient Analyses (GAO/AIMD-95-110, July 13, 1995);
Defense Transportation: Migration Systems Selected Without Adequate
Analysis (GAO/AIMD-96-81, August 29, 1996); and Defense IRM:
Critical Risks Facing New Material Management Strategy
(GAO/AIMD-96-109, September 6, 1996).
6 Weather Forecasting: Radars Far
Superior to Predecessors, but Location and Availability Questions
Remain (GAO/T-AIMD-96-2, October 17, 1995); Weather Forecasting:
Unmet Needs and Unknown Costs Warrant Reassessment of Observing System
Plans (GAO/AIMD-95-81, April 21, 1995); Weather Forecasting:
Improvements Needed in Laboratory Software Development Processes
(GAO/AIMD-95-24, December 14, 1994); Weather Forecasting:
Recommendations to Address New Weather Processing Systems Development
Risks (GAO/AIMD-96-74, May 13, 1996); Information Technology
Investment: Agencies Can Improve Performance, Reduce Costs, and Minimize
Risks (GAO/AIMD-96-64, September 30, 1996); and Weather
Forecasting: Systems Architecture Needed for National Weather Service
Modernization (GAO/AIMD-94-28, March 11, 1994).
7 Executive Guide: Improving Mission Performance
Through Strategic Information Management and Technology—Learning from
Leading Organizations (GAO/AIMD-94-115, May
1994). |